Dale Benz, Inc., Contractors, an Arizona Corporation v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania’s Empirical Analysis
303 F.2d 80 · 1962
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently May 1990 · most notably Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers (1990), Felder v. United States (1976)
30 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Irish v. United States · Hamilton v. Coogan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As a further preliminary statement to our discussion of this case we observe that ordinarily we would remand the matter back to the trial judge for more explicit findings. However, as this case is now before us we feel that we are in as good a position to determine the issues involved on the record before us as would be the trial judge on remand. Those issues arise out of and are concerned with figures and arithmetical calculations. In view of the foregoing, and to the end that useless motion and delay be eliminated we will determine the case at this time on its merits, being of the opinion that no good would be served by directing a remand for further and more specific findings.” Dale Benz, Inc., Contractors v. American Casualty Co., 9 Cir., 1962, 303 F.2d 80 , 82.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“expenses and attorney's fees incurred by the Contractor because of any default of (the) Subcontractor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.