Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 F.2d 855 - Arthur J. Goldberg, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Warren G. Kleban Engineering Corporation

Arthur J. Goldberg, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Warren G. Kleban Engineering Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

303 F.2d 855 · 1962

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
April 2015
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2015

11 federal appellate ·

100196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc. · Phillips v. Walling US · Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United States · Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co. · Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[M]ore important, in the context of the Act, the general contractor is a significant intermediary. The owner [of the building] looks to it for a completed operation. * * * [T]he purpose of the general contractor is to construct and turn over a completed facility and for which agreed compensation is paid. Moreover, when a subcontractor furnishes supplies and services, it does so with the expectation that they will be incorporated into the finished structure which thereafter is to be turned over by the contractor to another, the owner.” At 858-859.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.