Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 F.3d 1059 - Neighbors of Cuddy Mountain v. Alexander

Neighbors of Cuddy Mountain v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis

303 F.3d 1059 · 2002

Citation profile

119
cited by 119 later decisions
August 2020
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 38 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 119 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Lands Council v. Powell (2005), Native Ecosystems Council v. United States Forest Service (2005)

37 federal appellate · 38 district ·

680200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Kleppe v. Sierra Club · Church of Scientology of California v. United States · Mills v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “mandate particular results, but simply provides the necessary process to ensure that federal agencies take a hard look at the environmental consequences of their actions.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Specific projects, such as the Grade/Dukes timber sale, must be analyzed by the Forest Service and the analysis must show that each project is consistent with the plan.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.