Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 F.3d 231 - Ryan v. Miller

Ryan v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

303 F.3d 231 · 2002

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
4
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably United States v. Baker (2005), United States v. Dukagjini (2002)

42 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

780200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Williams v. Taylor · Bruton v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(d) An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim— (1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.