Turicentro, S.A. v. American Airlines Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
303 F.3d 293 · 2002
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 18 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Brunswick Corporation v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat Inc · Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters · Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The Sherman Act] shall not apply to conduct involving trade or commerce (other than import trade or import commerce) with foreign nations unless— (1) such conduct has a direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable effect— (A) on trade or commerce which is not trade or commerce with foreign nations, or on import trade or import commerce with foreign nations; or (B) on export trade or export commerce with foreign nations, of a person engaged in such trade or commerce in the United States; and (2) such effect gives rise to a claim under the provisions of [the Sherman Act] other than this section.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Challenges to subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) may be “facial” or “factual.” Facial attacks ... contest the sufficiency of the pleadings, and the trial court must accept the complaint’s allegations as true. In contrast, a trial court considering a factual attack accords plaintiffs allegations no presumption of truth. In a factual attack, the court must weigh the evidence relating to jurisdiction, with discretion to allow affidavits, documents, and even limited evi-dentiary hearings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`we review only whether the allegations on the face of the complaint, taken as true, allege facts sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the district court.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.