Taniguchi v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis
303 F.3d 950 · 2002
Citation profile
73 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 187 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Barron v. Ashcroft (2004), Denko v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2003)
73 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 911 · 18 U.S.C. § 982 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Cannon v. United States · Kleindienst v. Mandel · Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Bell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 187 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“purely one of law and the opposing party would suffer no prejudice as a result of the failure to raise the issue”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We have consistently held that standing does not require exercises in futility.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] court may review a final order of removal only if... the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.