Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 FSUPP 1240 - Gannon v. Action

Gannon v. Action’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 2004
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2004 · most notably Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. (1970), McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. (1976)

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

22019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Relies on Monroe v. Pape · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer · Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. · United States v. Price · Ohio Oil Co. v. Conway

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Civil Action for deprivation of rights: Every person who, under col- or of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “3. ACTION demands that Harms, Cadigan and Carberry place all police officers of their respective religious jurisdiction, guilty of firing at Black fleeing suspects, wounding or killing a Black fleeing suspect, under disciplinary action of the church and make it public.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.