Schad v. Finch’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1991
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 1001
Relies on Goldman v. Folsom · Boyd v. Folsom · Hodgson v. Celebrezze · Ferenz v. Folsom · Baker v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“«* * in our opinion, good cause for an order remanding the case to the Secretary has not been shown. There has been no showing of what additional evidence, other than that already discussed, might be presented on remand or that any additional evidence would have any bearing on the factual issues already resolved by the Secretary. Cf. Deskins v. Ribicoff, 232 F.Supp. 211 (S.D.W.Ya.1964). Nor do we think that remand should be ordered where the Secretary’s findings are not based upon vague, ambiguous or otherwise deficient evidence.” 303 F.Supp. at 599 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The Court * * * may, at any time, on good cause shown, order additional evidence to be taken * * * ”.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.