Mora v. Battin’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 1971
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281
Relies on United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Golden v. Zwickler · Zschernig v. Miller · Clark v. Allen · Dr. Bertrand O. Tyson v. Lt. Clarence J. Cazes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where it appears that a legatee or a distributee, or a beneficiary of a trust not residing within the United States or its territories will not have the benefit or use or control of the money or other property due him from an estate, because of circumstances prevailing at the place of residence of such legatee, distributee, or a beneficiary of a trust, the probate court may direct that such money be paid into the county treasury to be held in trust or the probate court may direct that such money or other property be delivered to a trustee which trustee shall have the same powers and duties provided in section 2119.03 of the Revised Code for such legatee, distributee, beneficiary of a trust or such persons who may thereafter be entitled thereto. Such money or other property held in trust by such county treasurer or trustee shall be paid out by order of the probate judge in accordance with section 2113.82 of the Revised Code. The county treasury shall not be liable for interest on such money held in trust.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"* * * where a statute permits inquiry into the type of government existing in a foreign nation, or into the operation of that government, or into the question of whether the legal `rights' guaranteed by that nation are rights in fact, or into the question of whether statements by the representatives of the foreign nation are credible or made in good faith, or into the likelihood that the legatees will actually receive the property left to them, such a statute, so applied, intrudes into the exclusive right of Congress to regulate foreign policy." [15] 303 F.Supp.at 664.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.