303 Ga. App. 593 - Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. McDavid’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · 200 Ga. App. 697 - Mattox v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority · Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n · 131 Ga. App. 840 - Crankshaw v. Stanley Homes, Inc. · GEORGIA NORTHEASTERN R. CO., INC. v. Lusk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Further, in cases such as this one, the circumstances surrounding the making of the contract, such as correspondence and discussions, are relevant in deciding if there was a mutual assent to an agreement. Where such extrinsic evidence exists and is disputed, the question of whether a party has assented to the contract is generally a matter for the jury.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“If a jury has returned a verdict, which has been approved by the trial judge, then the same must be affirmed on appeal if there is any evidence to support it as the jurors are the sole and exclusive judges of the weight and credit given the evidence. The appellate court must construe the evidence with every inference and presumption in favor of upholding the verdict, and after judgment, the evidence must be construed to uphold the verdict even where the evidence is in conflict. As long as there is some evidence to support the verdict, the verdict will be upheld on appeal. 2”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“While circumstances indicating that the parties intended to prepare a subsequent writing is strong evidence that they did not intend to be bound by a preliminary agreement, contrary evidence bearing upon the parties’ intent to be bound and reflecting the existence of a binding oral agreement presents a question of fact for the jury’s determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.