303 Ga. App. 831 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Suggs v. State · Brodes v. State · Domingues v. State · 300 Ga. App. 538 - Williamson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has not shown that the outcome of his trial would have been different had trial counsel obtained and called such a witness. "To establish the prejudicial effect of trial counsel's failure to present certain evidence, an appellant is required to make an affirmative showing that specifically demonstrates how counsel's failure would have affected the outcome of the case. Absent a proffer of what the testimony of his expert would have been at trial, [Glass] cannot show that there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different had his counsel taken the suggested course." [Cit.]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Glass v. State · Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.