Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 KAN 785 - State v. Daws

State v. Daws’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Toussie v. United States · State v. Ward · Gordon v. United States · State v. Plummer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in a criminal case, this court reviews the evidence in a light most favorable to the State to determine whether a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “without authority, entering into or remaining within any building ... in which there is a human being with intent to commit a felony, theft or sexually motivated crime therein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Appellate courts do not reweigh evidence, resolve evidentiary conflicts, or make witness credibility determinations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.