Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 KAN 899 - State v. Ryce

State v. Ryce’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
6
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

73 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Mapp v. Ohio · Chimel v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because it is reasonable to conclude that [K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 8-1025] prohibits conduct, in some circumstances, that is not constitutionally protected, the constitutionality of the statute can only be determined on a case-by-case, as applied, basis and we should not declare the statute to be facially unconstitutional.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “'not speculate as to the legislative intent behind it and will not read into the statute something not readily found in it.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.