State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Resendiz-Ponce · State v. Keel · State v. Valdez · State v. Jacques · State v. Bolin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(2) The sentencing judge shall establish a base sentence for the primary crime. ... An off-grid crime shall not be used as the primary crime in determining the base sentence when imposing multiple sentences. ... "(3) The base sentence is set using the total criminal history score assigned. "(4) The total prison sentence imposed in a case involving multiple convictions * arising from multiple counts within an information, complaint or indictment cannot exceed twice the base sentence. ... "(5) Nonbase sentences shall not have criminal history scores applied, as calculated in the criminal history I column of the grid, but base sentences shall have the full criminal history score assigned. ..."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Redick“"When sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in a criminal case, the standard of review is whether, after reviewing all the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, the appellate court is convinced a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Appellate courts do not reweigh evidence, resolve evidentiary conflicts, or make witness credibility determinations." State v. Lloyd , 299 Kan. 620 , 632, 325 P.3d 1122 (2014).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Nesbitt“acts committed before, during, or after the happening of the principal occurrence, when those acts are so closely connected with the principal occurrence as to form, in reality, a part of the occurrence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Nesbitt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.