Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 Ky. 686 - Hood v. Commonwealth

Hood v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 1967
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Carter v. Commonwealth · Carsons v. Commonwealth · Holmes v. Commonwealth · Harris v. Commonwealth · Brandriff v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This court has consistently recognized that the right of one standing accused of a crime to be represented by counsel carries with it the right of himself and counsel to have reasonable time to prepare for trial. But there is no showing here that delay would have been of any advantage to appellant or to his counsel in preparation of his defense, and, in the absence of such showing, it is manifest that the court did not err in overruling the motion for continuance.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.