Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably McMillian v. State (1992), State v. Hawkins (1992)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · Stovall v. Denno · Ashe v. Swenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Discovery and inspection in circuit court shall be as follows: (a) Disclosure Without Request.—Without the necessity of a request, the State’s Attorney shall furnish to the defendant: ****** (2) Any relevant material or information regarding: (A) specific searches and seizures, wire taps or eavesdropping, (B) the acquisition of statements made by the defendant to a State agent that the State intends to use at a hearing or trial, and (C) pretrial identification of the defendant by a witness for the State.” (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Baynor v. State · State v. Brown““The obligations of the State’s Attorney under this Rule extend to material and information in the possession or control of the State’s Attorney and staff members and any others who have participated in the investigation or evaluation of the action and who either regularly report, or with reference to the particular action have reported, to the office of the State’s Attorney.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Baynor v. State · Thomas v. State““(1) Witnesses. Disclose to the defendant the name and address of each person then known whom the State intends to call as a witness at the hearing or trial to prove its case in chief or to rebut alibi testimony; (2) Statements of the defendant. As to all statements made by the defendant to a State agent that the State intends to use at a hearing or trial, furnish to the defendant, but not file unless the court so orders: (A) a copy of each written or recorded statement, and (B) the substance of each oral statement and a copy of all reports of each oral statement.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Thomas v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.