Reynolds v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 1980
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cain v. Garvey · Dakan v. G. W. Chase, & Son Mercantile Co. · Walser v. Wear · Bank of Atchison County v. Byers · Fuggle v. Hobbs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““such damages as will enable him to receive not only the difference between the actual market value of the property and the price which he paid therefor, but something over and above such damages, if any, represented by the difference between the price actually paid by him for such property and what its value would have been if it had been as represented. Such damages enable a defrauded party to obtain ‘the benefit of his bargain.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McDowell v. Schuette
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.