Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 N.C. 112 - State v. Bracey

State v. Bracey’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

102 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Syriani (1993), State v. Robinson (1994)

102 state decisions

5501981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Harris v. New York · United States v. Louisiana · Moore v. United States · Beal v. Franklin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Two or more offenses may be joined in one pleading or for trial when the offenses, whether felonies or misdemeanors or both, are based on the same act or transaction or on a series of acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a single scheme or plan.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[WJhether the offenses are so separate in time and place and so distinct in circumstances as to render consolidation unjust and prejudicial. Whether offenses should be joined is a matter addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge. His ruling will be overturned only upon a showing that he abused his discretion. (Citations omitted.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a fair determination of the defendant's guilt or innocence of each offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.