Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 N.W.2d 129 - State v. Schomaker

State v. Schomaker’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
5
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2014

3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

701981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1792

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · State v. Hofer · Cedar Memorial Park Cemetery Ass'n v. Personnel Associates Inc. · State v. Washington · American Home Products Corp. v. Iowa State Board of Tax Review

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “open court.” It concluded that the legislature had intended the term to be read broadly to "encompass! ] any court where a defendant is protected against compulsion, coercion, or other improper persuasion”, and that in the case before it, the defendant’s confession was made in such a court, for his statement was a deliberate, counselled decision to establish his alibi defense and "was made under questioning by his own lawyer.” Id. at 132. Here, however, we have no such statute; the facts of the case, as far as we can know them, do not suggest a deliberate and counselled strategy decision by appellant to make a confession; and the questions were not put to appellant by his own counsel. . Majority at 500. The opinion states that appellant’s statement was made "after consulting with counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘Confessions are either judicial or extrajudicial. Judicial confessions are those made in conformity to law before a committing magistrate or in court in the course of legal proceedings. Extrajudicial confessions are those which are made by a party elsewhere than before a magistrate or in court. These, by the great weight or authority, independent of statute, must be corroborated by proof of the corpus delicti.’ [Citation omitted.]””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was made under questioning by his own lawyer.” Id. at 132. Here, however, we have no such statute; the facts of the case, as far as we can know them, do not suggest a deliberate and counselled strategy decision by appellant to make a confession; and the questions were not put to appellant by his own counsel. . Majority at 500. The opinion states that appellant’s statement was made”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.