Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 NW2D 71 - Scientific Application, Inc. v. Delkamp

Scientific Application, Inc. v. Delkamp’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

1 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2009

1 district · 17 state decisions

110198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wall v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co. · The Singer Company, a Corporation v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, a Corporation · 262 So. 2d 452 - Rehurek v. Chrysler Credit Corporation · Cook v. Stenslie · State v. Haakenson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “BUYER PURCHASES THIS RECREATIONAL VEHICLE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS: 1. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE EXCLUDED BY YOU [Swen-son] FROM THIS TRANSACTION AND SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE GOODS SOLD. [[Image here]] 4. Mechanical problems may arise with any recreational vehicle, I understand that there may be written warranties covering the recreational vehicle purchased, or any appliance(s) or component(s), such as those which have been provided by the manufacturers of the recreational vehicle, the appliance(s) and the component(s). I UNDERSTAND THAT THE MANUFACTURERS’ WARRANTY OR WARRANTIES I RECEIVED AT THE TIME OF SALE ARE MY EXCLUSIVE AND SOLE REMEDY FOR ANY PROBLEMS THAT I MAY HAVE WITH THE RECREATIONAL VEHICLE OR APPLIANCE(S) OR COMPONENT(S). I AGREE THAT NO OTHER REMEDIES ARE AVAILABLE TO ME, INCLUDING BY WAY OF EXAMPLE AND NOT BY LIMITATION SUCH REMEDIES AS REVOCATION OF ACCEPTANCE AND RESCISSION. [[Image here]] 6. I UNDERSTAND THAT FOR PURPOSES OF THIS TRANSACTION THE RETAIL SALES AGREEMENT/BUYERS ORDER AND THE MANUFACTURERS’ LIMITED WARRANTY ARE EXCLUSIVE AND INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTS. I UNDERSTAND THAT MUTUAL PRESENTATION OF THE RETAIL SALES AGREEMENT/BUYERS ORDER AND THE MANUFACTURERS’ LIMITED WARRNATY [sic] DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE DEALER WARRANTS THE UNIT IN THE NAME OF THE MANUFACTURER. I REPRESENT AND WARRANT THAT THE MANUFACTURERS’ LIMITED”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The touchstones hereafter for an effective appeal on any proper issue should be (1) that the matter has been appropriately raised in the trial court so that the trial court can intelligently rule on it, and (2) that there be a valid appeal from the judgment. Any other traps for the unwary on the road to the appellate courthouse should be eliminated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “explicitly negotiated between buyer and seller and set forth with particularity showing the particular qualities and characteristics of fitness which are being waived.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.