Thacker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1986
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 96 Okla. Crim. 36 - Fulbright v. State · 82 Okla. Crim. 220 - Mendenhall v. State · 91 Okla. Crim. 137 - Finley v. State · 91 Okla. Crim. 124 - Taylor v. State · 31 Okla. Crim. 326 - Walker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Counsel for the accused did not make timely objection to the introduction of the evidence. No motion to suppress the evidence was interposed and at the time the officers testified no objection was made to their testimony concerning the search and seizure of the whiskey. It was only at the conclusion of the evidence that counsel made a motion to strike the evidence pertaining to the whiskey for the reason that it was unlawfully obtained. Such motion came too late." Unless objection is made at the first opportunity when the alleged illegal evidence is sought to be introduced, the right of the accused to object to the admissibility of such evidence is waived."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Caskey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.