Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 P2D 449 - Ryles v. State

Ryles v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2011

4 state decisions

101956196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 84 Okla. Crim. 309 - Finley v. State · Beasley v. State · 66 Okla. Crim. 399 - Lee v. State · 21 Okla. Crim. 193 - Anderson v. State · 42 Okla. Crim. 26 - Taylor v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It has been repeatedly held that where the intent to commit a crime originates in the mind of the defendant even though persons acting under the directions of peace officers set a trap for the defendant suspected of planning the commission of a crime, if he commits the same, even though encouraged by the officers or persons acting under the direction of officers who laid the trap, a conviction can be had on such a basis for that is not entrapment.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the decoy suggests or initiates or induces the commission of the crime, or artificially propagates the crime or lures an otherwise innocent person to commit the crime..., a conviction cannot be had on such a basis for that is entrapment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “record fails to disclose any evidence on the part of the enforcement officers tending to induce the defendant to commit the crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.