Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 SW3D 46 - Vent v. Johnson

Vent v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nucor Corp. v. Kilman · Kohlenberger, Inc. v. Tyson's Foods, Inc. · B & F ENGINEERING, INC. v. Cotroneo · West Memphis School District No. 4 v. Circuit Court of Crittenden County · Allen v. Kizer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) It is declared to be the public policy of the State of Arkansas that all counties, municipal corporations, school districts, public charter schools, special improvement districts, and all other political subdivisions of the state and any of their boards, commissions, agencies, authorities, or other governing bodies shall be immune from liability and from suit for damages except to the extent that they may be covered by liability insurance. (b) No tort action shall lie against any such political subdivision because of the acts of its agents and employees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Wjhile absolute immunity 'bars a suit at the outset,' qualified immunity ‘is in the nature of an affirmative defense.’ ” Vent v. Johnson, 2009 Ark. 92 , 303 S.W.3d 46 (2009) (citing McCrory v. Johnson, 296 Ark. 231 , 755 S.W.2d 566, 572 (1988); see also Dermott Special Sch. Dist. v. Johnson, 343 Ark. 90 , 32 S.W.3d 477 (2000)) (distinguishing the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “limited immunity statutorily granted to political subdivisions from damages negligently inflicted on others”). .This Court has historically been very careful to characterize the conclusion reached in Pittsburgh Elevator as an”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.