¶1 ORDER
¶2 Stanley Boyd (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion to re-open his post-conviction case.
¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
¶4 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).