Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 303 U.S. 564 - United States v. Hendler

United States v. Hendler’s Empirical Analysis

303 U.S. 564 · 1938

Citation profile

254
cited by 254 later decisions
20
cited 20 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

129 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 254 later decisions (20 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1998 · most notably Crane v. Commissioner (1947), Commissioner v. Tufts (1983)

129 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

8501938194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. Hendler (from Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner · Douglas v. Willcuts · Minnesota Tea Co. v. Helvering · United States v. Hendler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 254 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The transaction, however, under which the Borden Company assumed and paid the debt and obligation of the Hendler Company is to be regarded in substance as though the $534,297.40 had been paid directly to the Hendler Company. The Hendler Company was the beneficiary of the discharge of its indebtedness. Its gain was as real and substantial as if the money had been paid it and then paid over by it to its creditors. The discharge of liability by the payment of the Hendler Company's indebtedness constituted income to the Hendler Company and is to be treated as such.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.