Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 Ark. 378 - Crossley v. State

Crossley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Walley v. State (2003), Polk v. State (2002)

50 state decisions

300199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Plotts v. State · Cary v. State · Embry v. State · Sanchez v. State · Wingfield v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under our law, it is clear that the State need not prove that the accused physically possessed the contraband in order to sustain a conviction for possession of a controlled substance if the location of the contraband was such that it could be said to be under the dominion and control of the accused, that is, constructively possessed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.