Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 Ark. 393 - Walker v. State

Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

112 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Humphrey v. State (1997), Isom v. State (2004)

112 state decisions

8201991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Looper v. Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'n · Kelly v. Kelly · Ashing v. State · Evans v. State · 390 Pa. Super. 558 - Commonwealth v. Leatherbury

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The seriousness of the offense, and whether violence was employed by the juvenile in the commission of the offense; (2) Whether the offense is part of a repetitive pattern of adjudicated offenses which would lead to the determination that the juvenile is beyond rehabilitation under existing rehabilitation programs, as evidenced by past efforts to treat and rehabilitate the juvenile and the response to such efforts; and (3) The prior history, character traits, mental maturity, and any other factor which reflects upon the juvenile’s prospects for rehabilitation.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When a case involves a juvenile age fourteen (14) years or fifteen (15) years at the time the alleged delinquent act occurred, the prosecuting attorney has the discretion to file charges in circuit court for an alleged act which constitutes capital murder, murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree, kidnapping in the first degree, aggravated robbery, or rape.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “While it might have been desirable and even preferable for the prosecutor to present additional evidence at the hearing to support retaining [Walker] in circuit court, we hold that the criminal information provided a sufficient basis for the trial court’s decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.