Dunn v. Means’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2004
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rose v. Dunn · Faith v. Singleton · Mangum v. Estate of Fuller · McDonald v. Petty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Further, where a document sets forth no words of a dispositive nature, it is defective on its face because it lacks the required intent to make a will, and extrinsic evidence is not admissible to prove the necessary intent. In this case, we find no testamentary intent whatsoever within the passage that Ms. Dunn claims to be the will of Mr. Rogers. Certainly, it cannot be said that this instrument's expressions are so clearly stated that, without inference, no mistake can be made as to the existence of testamentary intention.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Judee DunnClaude & I give you full power to do & take care of all our Business & do as you wish with, with it, with no problems from anyone. You can sell or dispose of all property & monies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.