Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 Ark. 619 - Davis v. Holt

Davis v. Holt’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2022

20 state decisions

801991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Saunders v. Haynes · Cummings v. Washington County Election Commission · Swepston v. Barton · Charisse v. Eldred · Krone v. Cooper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n established abode, fixed permanendy for a time for business or other purpose, although there may be an intent existing all the while to return ... at some time or other to the true domicile; but so difficult is it found to provide a definition to meet all the varying phases of circumstance that the determination of this question may present, that the courts say, that, subject to the general rule, each case must be decided on its own state of facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.