Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 F.2d 149 - Brown v. Chapman

Brown v. Chapman’s Empirical Analysis

304 F.2d 149 · 1962

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
15
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 4 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1963), Stewart v. Budget Rent-A-Car Corporation (1970)

31 federal appellate · 4 district · 18 state decisions — followed in 15 states

29019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 198 F. Supp. 78 - Chapman v. Brown · Hansen v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. · Bahlman v. Hudson Motor Car Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “6A-2-315. Implied warranty: Fitness for particular purpose. — Where the seller at the time of contracting has reason to know any particular purpose for which the goods are required and that the buyer is relying on the sellers' skill or judgment to select or furnish suitable goods, there is unless excluded or modified under the next section an implied warranty that the goods shall be fit for such purpose. As to foodstuffs or drinks sold for human consumption in sealed containers, there is an implied warranty that the goods shall be reasonably fit for such purpose, and such warrants shall extend from the seller and the manufacturer or packer of such goods to the person or persons described in § 6A-2-318 of this chapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.