United States v. Bugros’s Empirical Analysis
304 F.2d 177 · 1962
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 1984
17 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Berger v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We cannot condone the deliberate and unnecessary references to an immaterial detail____ To repeat the reference after the judge’s admonition was inexcusable .... Arguments such as those made in the prosecutor’s summation should be beneath the dignity of a representative of the government of the United States as they are incompatible with the proper administration of criminal justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.