Bomer v. Ribicoff’s Empirical Analysis
304 F.2d 427 · 1962
Citation profile
56 federal appellate · 6 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Sandstrom v. Chemlawn Corp. (1990), Van-S-Aviation Corp. v. Piper Aircraft Corp. (1977)
56 federal appellate · 6 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Willard v. Wood · Miller v. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. · A. B. Dick Co. v. Marr · Humphreys v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An action dismissed without prejudice leaves the situation the same as if the suit had never been brought. In the absence of a statute to the contrary a party cannot deduct from the period of the statute of limitations the time during which the action so dismissed was pending.””
10 later decisions quote this exact passage““On October 29, 1969, the Appeals Council sent, by certified mail addressed to the plaintiff at Route 2, Nicholasville, Kentucky 40356, notice of its action on the plaintiff’s request for review and of his right to com menee a civil action within sixty (60) days (Exhibit 1). “(b) No extension of the sixty days’ time specified in said notice (and in section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. section 405 (g)) for the commencement of a civil action was ever granted to the plaintiff, nor did he ever file such request for an extension of time for the commencement of such action.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.