Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 F.2d 623 - Blagaic v. Flagg

Blagaic v. Flagg’s Empirical Analysis

304 F.2d 623 · 1962

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2008
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2008 · most notably Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1963), Constantinos Roumeliotis and Panayota Roumeliotis, His Wife v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (1962)

31 federal appellate · 2 district ·

35019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chao-Ling Wang v. Pilliod · Soric v. Flagg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The procedure prescribed by, and all the provisions of sections 1031-1042 of Title 5, (Presently Sections 2341-2352, Title 28, U.S.C.) shall apply to, and shall be the sole and exclusive procedure for, the judicial review of all final orders of deportation heretofore or hereafter made against aliens within the United States pursuant to administrative proceedings under section 1252(b) of this title * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “his deportation will in the first instance be directed pursuant to section 243(a) of the Act [8 U.S.C. § 1253(a)] to the country designated by him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.