In Re Philip Bart’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 1984
1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ullmann v. United States · V Subversive Activities Control Board · United States v. Fitzgerald · McElrath Oka Symonds Glasser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whenever in the judgment of a United States Attorney the testimony of a witness ... in any case or proceeding before any grand jury or court of the United States involving any interference with or endangering of . the national security or defense of the United States . is necessary to the public interest, he, upon the approval of the Attorney General, shall make application to the court that the witness shall be instructed to testify . ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“One last point should be settled. However summary the proceeding and tentative the findings, the court’s ruling should rest on a sworn statement. * * * The judgment is based on facts and those facts should be presented to the Court in proper form, even if only on information and belief. See F.R.Civ.P. Rule 43(e). [Emphasis added] 304 F.2d at 637 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“become a loophole for the escape from punishment for the guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Carol Vericker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.