Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 F.3d 810 - Seiner v. Drenon

Seiner v. Drenon’s Empirical Analysis

304 F.3d 810 · 2002

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
September 2024
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2024

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

140200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Graham v. Connor · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Tennessee v. Garner · Gardner v. Buerger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To decide whether a particular use of force is objectively reasonable, courts examine the facts and circumstances of each case, including the crime’s severity, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of officers or others, and whether the suspect actively resists arrest or flees, (citation omitted). We consider only whether the seizure itself, .... and not preseizure conduct, was unreasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “under the Fourth Amendment and its `objective reasonableness' standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.