Morales v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Duncan v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Officers reasonably believed that they were executing the search pursuant to valid consent and are protected by qualified immunity.”); Sterling-Ward v. Tujaka, 230 Fed. Appx. 570 (6th Cir.2007) (affirming qualified immunity determination based upon apparent authority); Krug v. County of Rennselaer, No. 1:04-CV-0640 (TJM/DRH), 2010 WL 3937319 , at (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2010) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.