Johnson v. Bryco Arms’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2020
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Foman v. Davis · Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of such an extraordinary nature or so attenuated from the defendants' conduct that responsibility for the injury should not reasonably be attributed to them.” Gordon v. Eastern Ry. Supply, Inc., 82 N.Y.2d 555, 562 , 606 N.Y.S.2d 127 , 626 N.E.2d 912 (N.Y.1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The issue of proximate cause is generally a question of fact for the jury ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.