304 F. Supp. 2d 890 - Pugh v. Arrow Electronics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406
Relies on M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp. · Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute · Haynsworth v. The Corporation · Minnette v. Warner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.