Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 GA 131 - Stripling v. State

Stripling v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

51 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Vega v. State · Bradshaw v. State · Rodriguez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “are unreasonable ones no competent attorney would have made under similar circumstances.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “must show both that (his) counsel's performance was deficient and that the deficient performance so prejudiced (him) that, but for the deficiency, there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Under these circumstances, considered without the distorting effects of hindsight, trial counsel's decision[s were] not patently unreasonable, and [Allen's] ineffective assistance claim therefore fails.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.