Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 Ill. App. 3d 257 - People v. Bashaw

304 Ill. App. 3d 257 - People v. Bashaw’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 295 Ill. App. 3d 34 - People v. Reedy · 301 Ill. App. 3d 466 - People v. Hindson · 303 Ill. App. 3d 758 - People v. Dean · 299 Ill. App. 3d 836 - People v. Worden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Although the good-conduct credit scheme which may have been considered by the sentencing courts was invalid, the sentences imposed against defendants were, nevertheless, proper. Furthermore, it would be sheer speculation on our part to surmise the extent to which each sentencing court has ultimately factored in the truth-in-sentencing law’s good-conduct credit scheme in imposing each sentence against every defendant before it. Consequently, we find no justification for disturbing any statutorily sound sentence imposed against any defendant under the void truth-in-sentencing law.’ ” Bashaw, 304 Ill. App. 3d at 259 , quoting Reedy, 186 Ill. 2d at 16-17 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.