Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 Ill. App. 3d 260 - Warrender v. Millsop

304 Ill. App. 3d 260 - Warrender v. Millsop’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably 346 Ill. App. 3d 367 - Clayton v. County of Cook (2004), 398 Ill. App. 3d 837 - Wilbourn v. Cavalenes (2010)

40 state decisions

2601999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 294 Ill. App. 3d 531 - Department of Transportation v. Crull · 159 Ill. App. 3d 214 - Phelps v. O'MALLEY · 302 Ill. App. 3d 17 - Adami v. Belmonte · 288 Ill. App. 3d 408 - Iser v. Copley Memorial Hospital · 155 Ill. 2d 537 - Uhrhan v. Union Pacific Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All dates set for the disclosure of opinion witnesses and the completion of discovery shall be chosen to ensure that discovery will be completed not later than 60 days before the date on which the trial court reasonably anticipates the trial will commence.” 166 Ill. 2d R. 218(c).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is the Committee’s belief that in order to avoid surprise, the subject matter of all opinions must be disclosed pursuant to this rule and Supreme Court Rule 218, and that no new or additional opinions will be allowed unless the interests of justice require otherwise.” 177 Ill. 2d R. 213(g), Committee Comments, at xxx-xxxi.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.