Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 KAN 416 - State v. Lee

State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

37 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Alleyne v. United States · State v. Soto · State v. Lee · State v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' "(1) a sentence imposed by a court without jurisdiction; (2) a sentence that does not conform to the applicable statutory provision, either in the character or the term of the authorized punishment; or (3) a sentence that is ambiguous with respect to the time and manner in which it is to be served.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"As artfully crafted as his arguments are, they all seek application of later caselaw to the statute that was in effect at the time that he was sentenced. Lee was sentenced under a statute that did not, at the time, conflict with any higher court decision on the jury-determination question." 304 Kan. at 418 , 372 P.3d 415 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that does not conform to the statutory provisions, either in character or the term of the punishment authorized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.