Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 KAN 429 - State v. Rosa

State v. Rosa’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · State v. Ward · Lothian Cassidy, L.L.C. v. Lothian Oil Inc. · State v. McCaslin · State v. Reid

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in a criminal case, this court reviews the evidence in a light most favorable to the State to determine whether a rational fact-finder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.' [Citation omitted.]”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Possible 'innocent explanations' would include the claims that the defendant either was unaware of the presence of the drugs or was under the mistaken belief that the drugs were not illegal drugs but were some other lawful substance .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'joint . . . control over [the contraband] with knowledge of and intent to have such control.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.