Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 Kan. 710 - State v. Darrow

State v. Darrow’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ward · Lothian Cassidy, L.L.C. v. Lothian Oil Inc. · State v. McCaslin · State v. Keel · State v. Scott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'whether, after reviewing all the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, the appellate court is convinced a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Appellate courts do not reweigh evidence, resolve evidentiary 9 conflicts, or make witness credibility determinations.' [Citation omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]aking actual physical control of the vehicle is insufficient to attempt to operate that vehicle without an attempt to make it move.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “are not afforded the luxury of deciding this case on the basis of inferences we would have found most persuasive as a factfinder”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.