Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 KAN 773 - State v. Dunn

State v. Dunn’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

117
cited by 117 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

117 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Chapman v. State of California · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · United States v. Cotton · Bain Jr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'In making a sufficiency determination, the appellate court does not reweigh evidence, resolve evidentiary conflicts, or make determinations regarding witness credibility.' [Citations omitted.]”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 55 Kan. App. 2d 196 - State v. White · State v. Torres
  2. “shall be a plain and concise written statement of the essential facts constituting the crime charged.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Robinson · – State v. Harris –
  3. “'a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 55 Kan. App. 2d 196 - State v. White · State v. Gonzalez

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.