Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 KAN 89 - State v. Shank

State v. Shank’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ward · State v. King · Lothian Cassidy, L.L.C. v. Lothian Oil Inc. · State v. Robinson · State v. Dickey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In addition to or in lieu of any of the above, the court shall order the defendant to pay restitution, which shall include, but not be limited to, damage or loss caused by the defendant's crime, unless the court finds compelling circumstances which would render a plan of restitution unworkable. . . . If the court finds a plan of restitution unworkable, the court shall state on the record in detail the reasons therefor.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[a] district court's factual findings relating to the causal link between the crime committed and the victim's loss'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'Judicial discretion is abused if judicial action: (1) is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, i.e., if no reasonable person would have taken the view adopted by the trial court; (2) is based on an error of law, i.e., if the discretion is guided by an erroneous legal conclusion; or (3) is based on an error of fact, i.e., if substantial competent evidence does not support a factual finding on which a prerequisite conclusion of law or the exercise of discretion is based.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.