In Re Jose S.’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2010
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Walczak v. State · 20 Md. App. 179 - Matter of Sorrell · 46 Md. App. 1 - Mason v. State · 25 Md. App. 565 - In Re Appeal No. 769, Term 1974 · 24 Md. App. 82 - In Re Appeal No. 321
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“judge may enter a restitution judgment only after a restitution hearing wherein evidence is produced that is legally sufficient to establish the statutory criteria”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Ng
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.