Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 Md. 679 - Ferrell v. State

Ferrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2008

22 state decisions

100198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. Howard · Anderson v. Alabama · Tichnell v. State · Martin v. Davis · Chisley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he notion that a fully formed intent is always deliberate and premeditated, no matter how short the time between the first thought of the matter and the execution of the plan, is preposterous.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “defense of self-defense when deadly force is employed involves the conscious decision to employ that force”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “he” indicates it refers to Reid. . Recently, in Ferrell v. State, 304 Md. 679, 684 , 500 A.2d 1050, 1052-53 (1985), we repeated the definition of premeditation drawn from Chisley v. State, 202 Md. 87, 106 , 95 A.2d 577, 585-86 (1953) as "some appreciable period of time during which [the accused], after having formed ‘a specific purpose and design to kill’ had ‘full and conscious knowledge of the purpose to do so.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.