Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 304 Md. 689 - Hill v. Fitzgerald

Hill v. Fitzgerald’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
8
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 136 Ill. 2d 450 - Hayes v. Mercy Hospital & Medical Center (1990), Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. Sturm (2000)

5 federal appellate · 90 state decisions

37019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zablocki v. Redhail · Munn v. Illinois · Poffenberger v. Risser · 79 Ill. 2d 295 - Anderson v. Wagner · Carson v. Maurer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e think that the words of § 5-109 expressly place an absolute five-year period of limitation on the filing of medical malpractice claims calculated on the basis of when the injury was committed, i.e., the date upon which the allegedly negligent act was first coupled with harm. The purpose of the statute, readily evident from its terms, was to contain the “long-tail” effect of the discovery rule in medical malpractice cases by restricting, in absolute terms, the amount of time which could lapse between the allegedly negligent treatment of a patient and the filing of a malpractice claim related to that treatment. The statute is a response to the so-called crisis in the field of medical malpractice claims ... and contains no room for any implied exceptions.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) Limitations. — An action for damages for an injury arising out of the rendering of or failure to render professional services by a health care provider, as defined in § 3-2A-01 of this article, shall be filed within the earlier of: (1) Five years of the time the injury was committed; or (2) Three years of the date the injury was discovered.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “That every man, for any injury done to him in his person or property, ought to have remedy by the course of the Law of the Land, and ought to have justice and right, freely without sale, fully without any denial, and speedily without delay, according to the Law of the Land.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.