State v. Beach’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1993
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co. · 43 Ill. 2d 357 - Tolbird v. Howard · United States v. Krilich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No statement, confession, or admission in writing shall be received in evidence in any criminal proceeding against any defendant unless at the time of the taking thereof such defendant shall have been furnished with a copy thereof and which statement, confession, or admission shall have endorsed thereon or attached thereto the receipt of the accused which shall state that a copy thereof has been received by him.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Diersen · State v. Johnson“[T]he language of § 611.033 nowhere indicates that its application is limited to law enforcement agencies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Diersen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.